Data explorer
Who is feeding the machine.
Every law enforcement agency in a publicly accessible dataset maintained by LexisNexis, with the date of its last upload, the span of records it has handed over, and whether that same feed also lands in the Accurint Virtual Crime Center. Find your agency, then read what its dates are telling you.
Dataset as of Nov 8, 2026 · 1,700 agencies · 54 states and provinces
- Agencies in the dataset
- 1,700
- AVCC contributors
- 639
- Live interfaces
- 389
- Records uploaded
- 176.1M
LexisNexis's own list
340 uploading now
Uploaded within 10 days
LexisNexis's own count
How to read a row
What the labels mean +Close −
Two dates do most of the work. The last upload date is when the agency last pushed a batch of records to LexisNexis. The records date range is how old those records are. Read against the Nov 8, 2026 dataset date, they say whether the pipe is open, closed, or was only ever opened once.
- Live interface389 agencies
- Uploaded within 10 days of the dataset date. The interface is running: this agency's records were being copied into LexisNexis when we looked.
- Recently active424 agencies
- Last upload 11 to 90 days before the dataset date. Still connected, most likely, but on a slower or intermittent schedule rather than a daily push.
- Lapsed110 agencies
- Nothing uploaded for three months to a year. The interface may be paused, broken, or quietly switched off. The records already sent remain searchable.
- Former contributor777 agencies
- Last upload more than a year ago. This agency contributed in the past and its records are still in the system, but nothing new is going in.
- Archival upload258 agencies
- The newest record in the upload predates the upload itself by more than 90 days. That pattern reads as a one-time export of older records rather than a live feed keeping pace with new incidents.
- Crime types not submitted
- LexisNexis records, per agency, which crime categories are held back from the feed. The list is what an agency does NOT send: an agency showing “Attempted Homicide” submits everything except that category, and one showing “None” holds nothing back. Read it as the shape of the gap, not the shape of the contribution.
- AVCC639 agencies
- LexisNexis flags this agency's feed as also contributing to the Accurint Virtual Crime Center, the law enforcement side of the product, where records are searched, linked to people, and shared with every other subscribing agency. The rest of the dataset carries no such flag.
A caution about the “live” label: it describes the interface, not the contract. An agency whose last upload was two years ago may still hold a current LexisNexis agreement, and the records it already sent do not expire. They stay searchable. What changed is the flow of new ones.
Find your agency
Type any part of an agency name, a state, or an ORI. Select a row to open its dates, record count, and the categories it withholds.
Loading dataset…
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page is LexisNexis's own. They come from a publicly accessible dataset the company maintains, which lists each contributing agency, the date of its last upload, the date range of the records it has submitted, a record count, the crime categories included, and a flag marking the agencies whose data also feeds the Accurint Virtual Crime Center. This page reflects that dataset as of Nov 8, 2026. We have not altered the values.
What we added is arithmetic and labels. Status is the number of days between the dataset date and the agency's last upload, bucketed at 10, 90, and 365 days. The archival flag fires when the newest record in an upload is more than 90 days older than the upload itself. State is read from the first two characters of each agency's ORI and is left blank where the dataset uses a non-standard identifier. A handful of records carry placeholder dates (1753-01-01, 1900-01-01) that are database nulls rather than real dates; those are shown as blank.
One quirk worth knowing before you read the state counts: 474 of these entries are Ohio agencies whose records arrive through OIBRS, the state's incident-based reporting system, and carry an “- Oibrs” suffix. They are real contributions, but they arrive in bulk through one state pipeline, which is why Ohio outnumbers every other state on this list by a wide margin.
Absence from this dataset is not evidence that an agency shares nothing. It is one publication surface; agencies can and do contribute to LexisNexis through contracts that never appear here. That is what the rest of this site documents.